Artificial Snow: A Winter Olympics Debate
Artificial Snow: A Winter Olympics Debate
The Winter Olympics: a spectacle of human achievement, athletic prowess, and breathtaking displays of skill on ice and snow. But what if the snow isn't quite...real? The increasing reliance on artificial snow in the Winter Olympics has sparked a heated debate, pitting tradition against practicality, and raising concerns about environmental impact and fairness. Should artificial snow be allowed, or is it compromising the integrity of the Games?
The Argument for Artificial Snow
Proponents of artificial snow emphasize its necessity in ensuring the Winter Olympics can proceed reliably. Climate change is causing unpredictable weather patterns and reduced snowfall in many traditional winter sports locations. Artificial snow offers a way to guarantee consistent course conditions, regardless of natural snowfall. This consistency benefits athletes by providing a predictable surface for training and competition, reducing the risk of injury. Furthermore, artificial snow allows the Games to be held in locations that might not otherwise have sufficient natural snow, expanding the possibilities for hosting and potentially boosting local economies.
The Concerns and Counterarguments
- Proponents:
- People who support or advocate for something.
- Sustainable:
- Able to be maintained or continued without damaging the environment.
- Prowess:
- Great skill or expertise.
- Icier:
- Having more ice; more like ice.
- integrity:
- the quality of being fair, honest, and morally sound
- exacerbating:
- making an already bad situation or problem worse
- multifaceted:
- having many different sides, aspects, or features
One passage, many ways to practice
Reading-skill questions, word work and writing prompts — all built from this text.
Main Idea
Identify the central idea and explain how important details develop it.
Context Clues
Use clues in the passage to work out what words mean. A separate printable Vocabulary worksheet is also available.
Summarize
Select, organize, and restate the most important information without adding opinion.
Purpose
Analyze what the author aims to do and how choices serve audience and purpose.
Structure
Analyze how sections and organizational choices build the text's ideas or effects.
Fact & Opinion
Distinguish verifiable statements from judgments, beliefs, and preferences in context.
Claims & Evidence
Trace and evaluate how claims are supported by reasons and evidence.
Writing Prompts
Use the passage as a springboard for short written responses, from personal reflection to evidence-based arguments.
Fix the Sentence
Practice editing sentences drawn from this passage with a printable worksheet.
Ready to use this passage in class?
Start free with the Mixed worksheet and 3 PDF downloads each week. Focused skill sets depend on plan.
Preview questions from this passageShowHide
- 1What is the main debate surrounding artificial snow in the Winter Olympics?
- 2What are some of the reasons proponents give for using artificial snow?
Where this passage belongs
You Might Also Like
About this opinion / argumentative passage for Middle School
“Artificial Snow: A Winter Olympics Debate” is a opinion / argumentative reading passage about Winter Olympics, written for Middle School. It takes about 3 minutes to read (420 words) and comes with an interactive quiz and a printable worksheet with comprehension questions and an answer key.